Recently a woman came in to adopt a
dog to be a companion to her other female dog because she works long
hours. Until recently her dog had a cat to be her friend and before that
another dog that both died of cancer. She spent a lot of money on
surgeries and trying to fix the problem but unfortunately they both succumbed
to the illness.
She had always gotten her dogs from
rescues and her current dog, Allie, was adopted from Campbell County Humane
Society. She brought Allie in with her to help her make the
decision. We found her a dog that was perfect for her, a black lab mix
about 8 months old, who was a real charmer to the woman and to Allie.
I was helping her personally because
I know this woman and her family really well. I had this dog picked out for her
and helped her with the introductions. So here is her adoption profile: she
works long hours about 10-12 hours a day but the dogs have access to a doggie
door that leads out to a deck and a nice sized fenced yard. They can come and
go as they please and would have each other’s company while she was gone. All of
her animals are vaccinated and on heart worm prevention. She has a
wonderful relationship with her vet. The dog will have full run of the
horse farm when she is home caring for her horses and will be inside with her
when she is home and at night sleep in her bed
Sounds like a great set up
right?
But here’s the sad part - she tried to
adopt from a breed rescue a couple weeks before coming to us and they turned
her down.
Any ideas why?
Because she had a doggie door and
she worked too many hours a day. They didn't like that her dogs have easy
access to the outside fenced area while unsupervised. And she worked too
many hours during the day.
I feel that each organization has
the right to operate the way they want to and I try not to criticize them
publically especially since we, LHS, have been so criticized publically for our
owner surrender program without any consideration and without any real
knowledge of our operations. This has made me sensitive and I try not to
judge. Because we are each doing what we can to help the animals in our community
and many of the rescue organizations are all volunteer, they have other jobs
and responsibilities and they do what they can with the time and resources they
have. But every organization should stop and take a look at what they are doing from time to time to evaluate if there is a better way.
So I am not judging this situation
and I am not telling anyone they should or should not adopt to a certain
individual, but I am going to plead to these other groups to take a minute and
just consider a different point of view. They can ignore this or not, their
choice.
Not every breed rescue or in home
rescue operates this way but to those that do I am suggesting for you to
reconsider how you do adoptions. To those groups that do have a very thorough screening process that may
take weeks to complete, things like: Home visits, vet checks, no puppies or
small dogs can go to families with kids age 3 or under, reference checks,
every animal must be fixed in the household or your adopters must have a fenced
in yard. Please consider how many animals could you have taken in from a high
euthanizing pound during that process or how many people get fed up with the
process and go and purchase a dog from a breeder or pet
store.
At the Richmond SPCA we had trouble
with our adoption counselors declining good adopters or adopters we felt could
be educated to become great adopters with a little bit of counseling or
education. Because we were a No Kill shelter and we hardly ever
euthanized and they became complacent because animals were not dying at our
shelter. We made the entire group go over to the city shelter and take a
look at all the dogs/cats that were over there and made them see their faces
and show them that animals may not be dying here in our shelter but they are at
the city shelter every day. So if you turn down an adoption or if you are
waiting for the perfect home for a pet, another animal isn't being given an
opportunity to come to the RSPCA. You can decline adopters but be very
aware of what that decision does in the broad picture and be very confident in
your decision.
After we began to make the city
shelter tour part of the new employee orientation our adoption rates increased
and the adoption staff came up with some great ideas themselves on how to get
more animals adopted like only doing landlord checks on those adopters we
weren't sure about rather than everyone because that would slow us down after
hours and on weekends. They began to trust more and help educate
people. You do better when you know better and we find that sometimes
people just don't know that certain things aren't a good idea but when you explain
it to them they can make a change in how they care for their pets and become
better adoption candidates. Unfortunately if you decline them they are going to get a pet somewhere so if you take a minute to educate perhaps one of these days they will hear the message.
I ask you to please consider your
adoption policies and process and consider making it a bit easier and
quicker. Imagine how many more animals can be helped.
The other thing I want to bring up
is the idea of adoption specials and reducing fees. We do specials and
promote adoptions when we are full. We reduce our fees and try and move
out animals to good homes when we need to make space. I know you all feel the
stress of having to turn down animals when you don't have foster homes for
them. And many groups do specials so this is for those who don't. Maybe do some occasional adoption specials during the summer months
when everyone is overwhelmed. We find that everyone loves a deal and a
sale and we get some great adopters just wanting a new pet and find the
specials an incentive to get a new pet. We still do our normal
interviewing and screening and 99% of the time the adopters are wonderful. So
just consider the idea and do research on the no fee adoption idea. You will
find some great information from ASPCA and Maddie's fund on the research they
have done. They discovered that reducing the fee doesn't lead to an
increase in returns or reduce the importance of the pet or significance and
commitment the adopter makes.
By working together and considering
each other’s situations we can really make a difference and help more
animals. Thanks for all you do and for reading my ideas and thoughts.
PS. In regards to the
criticism of our surrender program for owners, it is working, it is making a
real difference. If you would like to learn more about our program we are
always happy to have you visit us for a few hours and we can show you how it
works and the statistical information on the program and how we feel it is
working.
Not so long ago I was declined by a breed specific rescue. 15 years as a vet tech, 10 as a trainer, and every bit of spare and not so spare time in recent years dedicated to coordinating canine fostercare at HSCC. Apparently not a good enough resume for whatever reason. So I have been on both sides. And here is my two cents for what they are worth. I view allowing a rescue dog to go into a home with intact animals to be irresponsible. History is the best indication we have for the future care of the lives we in trust to these people. I view constantly focusing on "the big picture" to be the equivilant of sending out a whole army into the field with flack jackets that are ok most of the time. I would rather send out a smaller fortified army who will be safe and protected and thrive....rather than 10 times that many to become cannon fodder. Rescue is basically an arranged marrige. And if I were to spend the rest of my days with a partner that I could not myself choose, I would want my Mach maker to be concerned with my happiness and not just getting it done so they could move on to their next available batchlorete in need. Even if that meant waiting until the next work week to make a three minute phone call that would protect my future. Do I think that some rescues are a bit over the top? Yes. Do they make mistakes in their judgment calls sometimes? Of course. They are human and this flawed. But the answer to saving more lives isn't taking short cuts, lowering our standards, or becoming lazy.... The answer is education. And inspiring others to join our cause. Because its worthy. And because then we wouldn't have to sacrifice quality for quanitiy. Because then everyone can have a sturdy flack jacket. I have been to the kill shelters. I go to them weekly. And it's heart breaking. But if I began giving away dogs to whoever showed up and waved their check book in the air.... If my priority became numbers in lue of the quality of each and every dogs life... Well then that would be the day that all those shelter dogs should take a number and join the cue of a DIFFERNT rescue, because this one has lost its way.
ReplyDeleteWOW! Very well stated Laura Linn.
DeleteI don't understand what exactly is irresponsible about allowing someone with intact dogs to adopt another dog. I know a lot of people who are wonderful dog parents and happen to have intact dogs for various reasons (one of which is that they show in conformation, which only allows intact dogs to show). I know a lot of people who breed dogs and also rescue, and they are fantastic homes for dogs.
ReplyDeleteThe idea that pets are being killed in pounds because of "pet overpopulation" is a myth. Pets are killed in pounds because pound staff kill them. Pets are saved in shelters (like LHS) where directors and staff that decide to take killing off the table as an option and implement the programs that save lives.
Denying adoptions to people who keep intact animals does not save pets.
The majority or people with intact animals are not breeding to Improve the breed. They are breeding for a new iPod and whatever technological tiddlywinks they can buy off their poorly bred, under socialized, genetic disasters. What good would come of supporting that? And if they don't care to avoid testicular cancer and pyometras on their current wards what does that say about the likely medical care that any future pets would receive? It's not ONLY about saving lives. It's about making sure that after those lives are saved that they are QUALITY lives.
ReplyDelete