Skip to main content

Help us Help The Animals- Open letter to supporters

Recently you may have heard reports about discussions between the Lynchburg Humane Society and the City of Lynchburg.  As someone who cares about the well being of the pets in our community, you are important to us and our efforts.  We are writing to share information and to ask for your help.

Some fifty years ago the Lynchburg Humane Society was founded on the idea that the pets of this community mattered.   Since that early beginning the City of Lynchburg has partnered with the Humane Society to provide pound services for the community.  We feel that this has been a worthwhile partnership for the citizens of Lynchburg.

The Lynchburg Humane Society, under the leadership of its Board of Directors, is poised to take the next step in its journey to prevent the unnecessary euthanasia of animals in our City and to solve the problem of pet overpopulation.  This journey began in earnest three years ago when Makena Yarbrough was employed as our first full time Executive Director.  Under her guidance the “kill rate” in our facility has been reduced from 51% to 10%.   Preserving and building on this track record will not be possible without a new facility to replace the current city shelter that has clearly outlived its useful life and is inadequate for its intended purpose.

The Humane Society has already purchased property and we are in the final stages of planning the design and construction of a modern facility for education, adoption, and animal sheltering services as well as a future expansion of the regional spay and neuter clinic with provisions to provide veterinary services for abandoned animals.   This new facility will require a broad based community effort not only on animal adoption but also on public education and community attitudes toward pets.  Further, it will require financial support from the community to achieve this goal.

Today, the partnership between the Humane Society and the City is at an important cross road. 

Building on our long-standing relationship, we have asked the City of Lynchburg to join us in this effort.  Clearly we do not expect the taxpayers of Lynchburg to fund our expanded “No Kill” mission.  This mission is the essence of our purpose as a charitable organization.  On the other hand, it is only reasonable that the City pay for the cost the Humane Society will incur in providing “city pound” services as required by law and at the same level that city residents have expected and benefited from for many years.  

To this end, we have entered into discussions with city administrators and council members seeking support for a small portion of the construction cost of the new facility we will build and own and for the development of a long-term agreement compensating the Humane Society for the operating costs incurred in providing these “pound services” on behalf of the city.  To expect less from the City would be to ask our donors to carry costs that are the City’s responsibility. 

These discussions are complicated by several factors. 

  • The city has enjoyed unrealistically low costs for pound services for a number of years.  For instance, in 2011 the City paid the Humane Society $104,500 plus utility costs for operating the city pound.  This equates to about $1.90 per capita (person).  The industry benchmark value placed on animal sheltering services is $4-$5 per capita.  Other similar Virginia cities like Roanoke pays $6.29 per capita, Charlottesville pays $5 per capita and Harrisonburg pays $4.66 per capita for pound services. 
  • We are requesting a gradual increase over 3 years to reach a $5.25 per capita rate which equates to $396,735 a year in operating funds in fiscal year 2015.
  • The estimated operating cost for the City to run their own pound would be around $5.53 per capita or $417,600 per year.  The current building would cost the City at least $725,000 to renovate, with continued repairs and maintenance. The Humane Society is requesting an initial investment in our new facility, by the City, of $240,000 in 2012 with a total 5 year capital investment of $675,000 for pound space in the new state of the art facility, with no further maintenance liability.
  • The City budget is under considerable stress – and any increase in payment is difficult due to the poor economic conditions and cut backs in state funding. 
  • Our proposal to the city is conservative compared to the costs and liability the City would incur by operating its own pound.  But, it does still represent an increase in total cost to the city over time.

Despite these complications, the Humane Society Board is convinced that the time is right to move ahead.  Either we move ahead – or the current inadequate facilities and funding will compromise all the progress we have made.  The City Manager and staff and many members of Council have expressed their interest in developing a long-term agreement with the Humane Society that meets the goals of all parties.  We appreciate their insight and support.   As a group, City Council recently voted to determine if there were any other parties that were qualified to provide pound services to the city and, if no one came forward, then enter into negotiations with the Humane Society for a long term agreement.  It remains to be seen whether the majority of Council will vote to approve an agreement that will fairly compensate us for providing the services that are mandated by law and those consistent with our operations over the years. 

What you can do now:

  • Let your City Council member know how you feel about this issue.  Call, email or write Council members (see attached) to let them know that partnering with the Humane Society to compassionately care for animals is important to you as a voter.
  • Explain this issue to your friends and neighbors and ask them to speak up for animals and the Humane Society as well.
  • Look for additional information and contacts from us to keep you informed about our progress as plans develop.

In closing, thank you for your support and for your interest in making our community a better place for all people and pets.



Brenda Gray, President of the Board of Directors
Makena Yarbrough, Executive Director



City Council Members and City Manager contact information

H. Cary, III (at large)                       h.cary@lynchburgva.gov                       384-0495
Joan F. Foster, Mayor                    joan.foster@lynchburgva.gov                 455-3639
Michael Gillette (ward I)                michael.gillette@lynchburgva.gov           384-5322
Jeff Helgeson (ward III)                 jeff@jeffhelgeson.com                           610-7478
Ceasor Johnson, Vice Mayor       ceasor.johnson@lynchburgva.gov           401-0753
Randy Nelson (at large)                 randy.nelson@lynchburgva.gov              401-0696
Turner Perrow (ward IV)              turner.perrow@lynchburgva.gov            384-5557
Kimball Payne, City Manager      kpayne@lynchburgva.gov                        455-3990

Comments

  1. I sent my letterS... Please see below a copy of the letter sent to ALL board members:

    As avid animal lovers we are asking you to PLEASE support the Lynchburg Humane Society’s efforts in making a more HUMANE space for “our” animals in OUR community! As a VOTER, this is VERY important to our family. It has come to our attention as supporters of the Lynchburg Humane Society that… “It remains to be seen whether the majority of Council will vote to approve an agreement that will fairly compensate us for providing the services that are mandated by law and those consistent with our operations over the years.” (from the Lynchburg Humane Society blog) We are in total agreement that NOW is the time to move forward with this project (the current facility is totally disgusting and unacceptable). Either we move ahead with this project or the current inadequate facilities and funding will compromise all the progress that has been made up to this point…. and what a shame that would be. We are counting all members to support this initiative as this proposal to the city is conservative compared to the costs and liability the City would incur by operating its own pound. Thank you in advance!

    Sincerely,

    The .... Family

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here is my letter - feel free to share.
    Dear City Council

    10 years ago we adopted our dog from the local humane society. He has been as much a part of our family as our two children.
    I am writing to ask you to support the Lynchburg Humane Society. It has provided pound services at unsustainably low cost to the city.
    While everyone is aware that the city budget is under stress - it will not benefit the city at all to avoid this responsible choice to pay fair price for pound services.
    The city cannot afford to run its own pound. The Humane Society has a reasonable plan to continue to care for our animals - to provide education, adoption, and shelter services as well as a spay and neuter clinic.
    Your decision for the City to partner with the Humane Society to compassionately care for animals is VERY important to me as a voter.
    thank you.

    Rachel Gagen

    ReplyDelete
  3. Every community should have an animal shelter willing to go the extra mile like the Lynchburg Humane Society. The No Kill Movement is worldwide and community member should accept nothing less than this for its animals. Until LHS began this new program it was operating under and outdated system that was not accomplishing the agenda of a true humane society. Now they are saving 90% of the animals and educating the public on what we all can do to save lives and make our efforts count. Without willingness to improve old systems that kill animals it only serves as a great injustice to the animals and the community members that care about them.

    The city has an opportunity to make this transition with us and make their mark on what is important in life. In relative terms the amount of money the shelter needs to build is small in comparison to other "approved" budgets. The council members that don't agree need to realize it's going to happen with or without them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One of the things that hits me is the value of life whether a human or a four legged creature or with feathers. Where we value our animals and treat them well it will be passed on to humans at the same time and will be betterment for the whole world.

    Plus, there is a role for each creature in the world. A no-kill program will put something of a cap on overpopulation for many parts of the food chain. I have seen rodents rise in population and be a problem in neighborhoods where there is nothing but killing the feral cats. Where there is a trap/neuter/return program, it is a much better area to live in. I'm all in for that being where I live now. Lynchburg!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IS LHS UNDER ATTACK?

In 2013 the Lynchburg Humane Society (LHS) ended the year with a 92% save rate for the animals in our care, the highest year end figure since we began down the path to No Kill.   We were able to reduce the number of cats we took in by 294, compared to 2012, due primarily, we believe, to our spay/neuter efforts.   YOU made this possible.    We believe the Lynchburg Humane Society is about to be embroiled in a controversial attack by another humane organization because of all the great work we are doing.   We want our community and our supporters to know why and to be informed about this controversy because without you we could not do what we are doing.   You all are partners in our efforts.     This is long so please hang in there and read it in its entirety because there is important information throughout that you probably don’t know.    In April PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) sent us a letter askin...

They know what they know so don’t give them the facts.

I had the pleasure of having an interesting conversation with a member of another humane organization this past weekend. They are an SPCA that takes in animals for a number of localities and operates as the pound for their area. She asked how we were doing in Lynchburg and I, of course, was excited to tell her about our recent success about our save rate being 84% and having no healthy animal lose their life in our shelter in 2010 and how much the community has embraced the changes as we move toward becoming No Kill. She immediately went to defense mode and asked me loaded questions to prove I was wrong and of course explain to me how our programs wouldn’t work for them. The appointment system, wouldn’t work – pet owners aren’t responsible enough to do the right thing. People must be just “dumping” their animals in other localities.” Fact : The counties that reported their stats for 2010 in the Lynchburg area saw a reduction in the number of animals they took in and more...

When the tables turn

It is not unknown for people to be scared of dogs. Animal shelters throughout history were built on that fear. Dog catchers were employed to capture packs of nuisance dogs that were roaming and pestering communities. Pounds were built on the edge of towns near the dump to remove stray dogs from towns and in most cases, destroy them to prevent public endangerment.   Fast forward to now and shelters are referred to as centers, instead of strays we say adoptable, we don’t say animals we say pets, and dogs are family members. Getting a dog without a home into a family is a community effort and #adoptdontshop is a movement.  So how strange it is that the COVID-19 pandemic has made us fear being too close to people and has increased our desire for pets?  People want to foster or adopt pets, now more than ever! At the Lynchburg Humane Society’s Center for Pets there has been an increase of 85% more pets in foster care than at this time last year. The Lynchburg Humane...